Which claim would alan weisman most likely agree with? a) natrue will never recover from humanity´s destructiveness b) new york city lack a viable ecosytem for supporting life. c) nature is more powerful than it at first apears. d) people have almost no real effect on the enviroment

C) Nature is more powerful than it at first appears.

Explanation:

In The World Without Us, Alan Weisman describes a post-apocalyptic world in which there are no humans anymore. He imagines what the world would look like without us, and whether the Earth would be able to recover from the damage we have inflicted on it. He concludes that nature is more powerful than it at first appears, and that most of the Earth would be able to continue just as before, with some minor adaptations and very little left of our legacy.

what are the options?