Suppose a student contradicts a statement that she has made during a group discussion. which of these is the best way to work toward resloving the contradiction?
a. "o. k., the character's motivation is a tricky topic. let's move on to the chapter where the author describes the setting."
b. "the problem with that statement is that it's based on an article that is clearly biased. the author works for an oil company.
c. "it sounds like you're supporting two different sides of the issue. let's look at how the research supports these points."
d. "i'm not sure we can trust that source. can we find out a little more about who wrote it and when? "

The answer is C. It's the only one that points out the that the student is contradicting herself.

the patriots are

hello, never fear the humanspider is here!

answer: this is what i could find because i never done this work before.

it's likely the answer would be c.

- a - you could speak slowly, but if you used the same humor and a higher complexity or the same level of complexity, they might understand what to do.

- b - the humor presented might not be understandable to the 1st graders.

- d - explaining where peanut butter comes from is irrelevant to the homeeco class.

**c - by adjusting the level of complexity, you are going to a point of talking where everybody understands you, if you what i'm saying.**

note: if you loved this answer click that cool mark brainliest button buddy!

~

your friendly neighborhood human spider.