Which statement best describes the validity and sufficiency of reagan’s evidence?

a. it is relevant but is insufficient to prove his claims as it relies on his own beliefs.

b. it is irrelevant and insufficient so it weakens his argument overall.

c. it is irrelevant as it does not directly speak to the cold war.

d. it is relevant and sufficient evidence using real-world examples to support his claims.

u forgot to wipe

explanation:

the answer is:

in the fourth paragraph. ( the paragraph that begins with “on friday of my third ”).

hope it !

the correct answer is "dissent"

explanation:

because dissent is when one or more judges express disagreement with the majority in court, in specific legal systems.   an   argument in opposition is presented to the court, with a different interpretation, or application.

elie wiesel is a holocaust survivor

explanation: