In elie wiesel's speech "the perils of indifference," one of the speaker's purposes seems to be to encourage the audience to prevent negative events in the past from being repeated in the future. does wiesel effectively convince his audience to keep history from repeating itself? why or why not? be sure to use specific details to support your argument.

Read the excerpt from martin luther king jr.’s "i have a dream” speech. and so let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of new hampshire. let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of new york. let freedom ring from the heightening alleghenies of pennsylvania. let freedom ring from the snow-capped rockies of colorado. let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of california. but not only that: let freedom ring from stone mountain of georgia. let freedom ring from lookout mountain of tennessee. let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of mississippi. from every mountainside, let freedom ring. the most likely reason king uses allusions in this part of his speech is to share his knowledge of american geography. compare northern and southern destinations. remind listeners about small-town accountability. encourage listeners to envision freedom everywhere.

The consequence of jim smiley’s human foible adds to the story’s humor. what foible does smiley demonstrate?

Which claim does the sentence "teach english and play with children in local orphanages by day and enjoy the sights and new friends by night" support?