Read the sentence. the lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case in the hopes of winning the trial. which is the best revision of the sentence? the lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury (it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case) in hope of winning the trial. the lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury—it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case—in hope of winning the trial. the lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury, it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case, in hope of winning the trial. no change

The best revision of the sentence is "The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury (it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case) in hope of winning the trial."

Explanation:

This sentence includes information that is not determining to its meaning, this information can be set apart by the use of parenthesis.

One of the uses of parenthesis is to enclose detail information or information that adds detail to the general sentence or clarifies pieces of information in the main part. It separates defining from non defining information.

is A The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury (it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case) in hope of winning the trial.

Explanation:

the middle one

explanation:

because it's about a pauper

allusion   is the right answer