“well,” he says, “there’s excuse for picks and letting-on, in a case like this; if it warn’t so, i wouldn’t approve of it, nor i wouldn’t stand by and see the rules broke—because right is right, and wrong is wrong, and a body ain’t got no business doing wrong when he ain’t ignorant and knows better. it might answer for you to dig jim out with a pick, without any letting-on, because you don’t know no better; but it wouldn’t for me, because i do know better.”

the meaning in this excerpt is

connoted
explicit
implicit
inferred

Option B:- explicit

Explanation:

The writer here describes his opinion about a case. He knows better than anyone regarding Jim. He states this clearly and in detail that he cares about the rules, no matter what the situation is. He explains all the rules without confusion and doubt.

explicit

Explanation:

The speaker is very clear about his opinions. There's no room for interpretation. You must follow the rules if you know them, because right is right and wrong is wrong, since "There's no excuse for picks and letting-on". If you're capable of understanding what is right and what is wrong, you have no excuse to do something wrong.

there are many cases in the crucible where propaganda is present, the types of propagandas that are shown are: bandwagon, testimonial, transfer, and card-stacking. the crucible is mainly focus on the ancient beliefs that people from towns had, if someone didn’t follow the rules they would be punished.

we have no idea what story or poem you mean? ?

explanation: