What does zeus allow, for the first time, with the phaeacians?

he allows poseidon to punish them for being good hosts.
he allows a ship to deliver a wayward stranger unharmed.
he allows poseidon to associate with them undisguised.
he allows the king to taste ambrosia.

He allows Poseidon to punish them for being good hosts.

Explanation:

Throughout The Odyssey, we learn that it is extremely important for Greek culture to be a good host. Characters are often rewarded for acting in this way. However, we see that this is different in the case of the Phaeacians. When Odysseus arrives, they are extremely good hosts. They provide shelter, restore all the lost wealth of Odysseus and give him direct passage to Ithaca. However, in doing so, they offend Poseidon, which leads to Zeus allowing Poseidon to punish them.

  plan: i will begin with a quotation about the importance of unity in a community. then, i will state my claim that an activity will unite our school by creating a shared vision, purpose, and direction. in the body, i will use three main points that describe the different avenues the students can take: through a variety of clubs, through a special event, or through an awareness week. i will provide evidence about other towns that have unity activities and the kinds of events that they include. pictures will illustrate my three main points in action. for the ending, i will restate the main idea in a new way and pose a question to keep the audience thinking. 

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war