Excerpt from battling cancer: one woman's journey
tracy wilson

1 julianne had never given much thought to cancer before one dismal monday morning last april. the dawn clouds were gray and heavy, and it looked as though it might rain at any second as julianne meandered to the mailbox at the end of the lawn. as she opened the box, the rusty hinge made a screech much like someone scraping fingernails across a blackboard. the news julianne received in a postcard that day was much more unnerving. it was simply stated: "miss taylor, call our office to schedule a follow-up appointment as soon as possible. tests from your annual physical examination have revealed an abnormality." "abnormality? " julianne questioned. what kind of abnormality could a 24-year-old woman, who exercised religiously and consumed a healthy diet, possibly have? within hours she learned the answer to this question only to pose a thousand more in its place.

the main idea of section one is that julianne received some upsetting news. which detail from section one supports this main idea?
a) the bad weather was upsetting to julianne.
b) the postcard referred to abnormal test results.
c) the postcard stated julianne must come in for additional tests.
d) julianne was upset that private information was on the postcard.

B)The postcard referred to abnormal test results.  

Explanation:

This detail supports the main idea that Julianne received upsetting news. The last three sentences of section one support this answer choice.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

answer: i am not sure but i think you should go for c

explanation: