subject
English, 09.07.2019 22:20 163565

Have a group discussion with some peers (or just answer the question as if you did).
using a word-processing program, write a two- to three-paragraph evaluation of the discussion.
b) include responses to these questions in your evaluation:
 what did you do to prepare in advance for the discussion? how well prepared were you?
 what rules were created for the discussion? were they followed?
 how well did you present your viewpoint?
 how did your own background knowledge, experience, values, or beliefs affect the way
you presented your views? explain.
 how successful were you at listening and responding to other group members?
 how did you use evidence to explain and defend your views, including when someone
disagreed with you?
 in what ways did other participants use reasoning and evidence to make their points?
 were there any times when someone didn’t use evidence or the evidence didn’t match
the viewpoint presented? did a participant exaggerate or distort information? explain.
 was there a time when someone’s viewpoint differed from your own? what might have
influenced his or her opposing viewpoint? explain.
 how was your language grammatically correct and appropriate to the topic, purpose,
and audience? give an example.
 what kinds of hand gestures and facial expressions did you and other people use to
match what was being said?
 how did you use eye contact, the volume of your voice, or other means to connect with
others during the discussion?
 how well did the group solve problems and come to consensus?
 overall, how effective was the group discussion?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 16:00
Metonymy is best defined as a figure of speech in which
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:30
Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 00:40
Which best describes the tone in these lines "the fish"
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:30
Read the excerpt. “this is a train-servicing station and we have to wait for a train.” he shakes his head. i smile. “it’d be nice if we could get one.” lauren mizock has revised her draft of “train tracks” to convey plot events using
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Have a group discussion with some peers (or just answer the question as if you did).
using a w...
Questions
question
Biology, 24.09.2019 00:10
question
Mathematics, 24.09.2019 00:10
question
Mathematics, 24.09.2019 00:10
question
Mathematics, 24.09.2019 00:10
Questions on the website: 13722367