Nora: in all these eight years—longer than that—from the very beginning of our acquaintance, we have never exchanged a word on any serious subject.
helmer: was it likely that i would be continually and forever telling you about worries that you could not me to bear?
nora: i am not speaking about business matters. i say that we have never sat down in earnest together to try and get at the bottom of anything.
helmer: but, dearest nora, would it have been any good to you?
nora: that is just it; you have never understood me. i have been greatly wronged, torvald—first by papa and then by you.
how does the conflict in the text best connect to the views of society in the late 1800s?
the conflict between nora and helmer shows how men and women could not agree on issues or successfully work together to solve important problems.
the conflict between nora and helmer shows how gender roles were defined, as helmer has complete control over everything, including what the couple discusses.
the conflict between nora and helmer shows how men attempted to limit women’s economic freedoms, causing nora to lie about how she obtained money.
the conflict between nora and helmer shows how women who ended marriages had no rights, leading nora to have to hide her true feelings in order to stay married.

hmm, sadly there is no dialogue. there is no place in the story where he is talking to anyone. it's more of just describing what he eats and where he sleeps. you have to become anne frank, give details of where you are, what other folks look like, how the environment is. have a little bit of dialogue tell of what people are specifically saying. anne frank talked about her entire household including the people, the objects, the lighting, the food they ate, and even the smell in the air. there has to be more to your diary entries, the whole story in its current state is only about peter van daan, the food, the sounds, and where he sleeps. also he seems to be writing only once a year yet more than that happened from day to day. for a friend, i can you write it out, if you want.

theresa is going to be my girl this year, he promised himself as he left the gym full of students in his new fall clothes.

educational segregation in the us prior to brown.

the members of the u.s. supreme court that on may 17, 1954, ruled unanimously that racial segregation in public schools is unconstitutional.

judgment and order of the supreme court for the case.

u.s. circuit judges robert a. katzmann, damon j.

the u.s. supreme court's decision in brown v. board of education marked a turning point in the history of race relations in the united states. on may 17, 1954, the court stripped away constitutional sanctions for segregation by race, and made equal opportunity in education the law of the land.