Arizona
on which two points does chief justice warren criticize the police interrogators implicated in the three cases ruled on in miranda v. arizona?
a.
giving false legal advice to suspects under interrogation
b.
interrogating suspects in an intimidating setting
c.
failing to notify suspects of their constitutional rights
d.
subjecting suspects to acts of physical violence during interrogation
e.
threatening to hold suspects in custody without bail

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

what are you