How does truths discussion of the bible and religion contribute to her defense of women’s rights?

sojourner didn't make any moral demands on her audience. despite being devoutly christian and having a firm faith in god's ability to change the status quo, she trusted the common sense of the listeners to realize the truth of her words.

explanation:

this isn't to say she didn't make several allusions and invocations of god throughout "ain't i a woman? " that was only good speech-making sense, given that a large portion of her audience was somehow involved in religious groups. she played to her strengths without preaching at the attendees

.

the question concerns exactly this part of the speech:

i am not now thinking of the loss of property involved, immense and serious as that is, but only of the wanton and wholesale destruction of the lives of non-combatants, men, women, and children, engaged in pursuits which have always, even in the darkest periods of modern history, been deemed innocent and legitimate. property can be paid for; the lives of the peaceful and innocent people cannot be.

president wilson talks about the lives of people destroyed by german army. but these people are not americans, they are the local people living in europe. the president mentions the barbarity of germans, considering that he is not targeting the nation, instead it is said about german army. the correct answer is the last one.

a conclusion based on evidence is an example of a. inference