Determine whether the following arguments are best interpreted as being inductive or deductive. also state the criteria you use in reaching your decision (i. e. the presence of indicator words, the nature of inferential link between premises and conclusion, or the character or form of argumentation) the matterhorn is higher than mount whitney, and mount whitney is higher than mount rainier. the obvious conclusion is that the matterhorn is higher than mount rainier. hurley, patrick j.. a concise introduction to logic (p. 41). cengage learning. kindle edition.

compare & contrast informative essay/speech

when speaking or writing for the sole purpose of providing information in order to give audience members a good basis for making a decision, you would present an informative speech or essay.   because you wouldn’t want to be persuading the audience by arguing for one type of exercise over the other, you wouldn’t choose a persuasive/argumentative technique.   to fairly, and without bias, present information about the pros and cons of each type exercise, a compare/contrast, informative speech/essay would be the best bet.

i think one answer could be this poet uses no rhyme.

the correct answer can either be a or b because it could be both but you should probally choose b

(you didn't attach a copy of the poem, but i'm answering as best as i can)

since a simile compares two unlike things using like or as, it kind of gives an item the ability to do something it can't.

example: "the player was like a tiger on the field"

in this sentence, the simile conveys the idea that the player was fast and strong, like a tiger.