You have the choice of going to hawaii for a week, staying at work for the week, or spending the week skiing. if you decide to go to hawaii, the opportunity cost is a. the value of working and skiing. b. working, because you would be giving up a week's pay. c. the value of working or skiing, depending on which you would have done rather than go to hawaii. d. none of the above if you enjoy the time spent in hawaii.

C. the value of working or skiing, depending on which you would have done rather than go to Hawaii.

Explanation:

Economists implement the term opportunity cost to denote that people have to give up on some things to acquire some other things they desire. As there is a limitation of resources, every time you choose the way to use them, you are at the same time giving up on some other options. In economics, whatever choice you make implies an opportunity cost.

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war

its probably fingerprint or personality