This passage from the story describes rainsford setting the malay mancatcher trap. write three to five sentences explaining how the film version of this scene is similar to or different from the written scene. why do you think the filmmakers made these choices?

Hello! In the film version of the scene, Rainsford and his companion discuss how the trap will work, and the filmmakers show them working on it. In the story, the narration quickly moves from Rainsford finding the tree to the trap being built, without explaining what exactly he did. This creates suspense in the story, as the reader is not sure what Rainsford is doing. But in both the film and the story, Rainsford uses the same kind of trap. The filmmakers probably wanted the audience to be able to see the trap.

Different character, explanation of the trap was more in the film and while both story and film mentioned the trap, the writers created suspense for the audience.

Explanation:

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

in this passage from chapter 6 of "animal farm", by george orwell, what the author is ridiculing in this passage is the frivolity of some rules.

clover, the mare, believes she remembers that the fourth commandment forbade sleeping in beds because it was something that humans did. snowball, napoleon, and the pigs are brain-workers who look after the welfare of the farm. they are the obvious leaders because they are smart, and so they are entitled to eat the best food and sleep in beds. it is squealer, who says these lines making the difference between sleeping with sheets, what humans do, and sleeping in beds, what pigs do. the unwillingness to question authority makes the oppressed to obey without thinking.