There must be extraordinary things to discover and understand in space. i get that. but, what is our rush? wouldn't our energy be better spent trying to solve so many other problems that plague mankind where we live today? there is truly no shortage of these relatively local kinds of problems. just contemplate with me what those leading scientists and innovative thinkers, who spend all their time contemplating the existence of universes, galaxies, and other worlds currently beyond our reach, could accomplish if they turned their telescopes toward home?
what detail do both authors include?

A biology investigation usually starts with an observation—that is, something that catches the biologist’s attention. For instance, a cancer biologist might notice that a certain kind of cancer can't be treated with chemotherapy and wonder why this is the case. A marine ecologist, seeing that the coral reefs of her field sites are bleaching—turning white—might set out to understand why.

Explanation:

chapter i -- paris: september, 1792

a surging, seething, murmuring crowd of beings that are human only in name, for to the eye and ear they seem naught but savage creatures, animated by vile passions and by the lust of vengeance and of hate.

during the greater part of the day the guillotine had been kept busy at its ghastly work: all that france had boasted of in the past centuries, of ancient names, and blue blood, had paid toll to her desire for liberty and for fraternity.

hope this answer you: )!

the rocket launch by showing how the population around it changes its behavior as the earth's influence over the martian planet when he uses the term "green star".

explanation: