You are a twenty-first century philosopher and you have been asked to give a senior lecture on the connection romantics see in the natural cycle of life. write the lecture notes you make to yourself for showing this connection in twenty-first century terms. you may use some bullet points, but the rest of your notes must be in complete sentences. your answer should be at least 250 words.

Influence of Romanticism

Explanation:

First of all, we have to know something about this period and cultural movement so we can talk about its influence in this, our century.

Romanticism was a period of late 18th and early 19th century and it was an art, intellectual and literature movement.

An Important thing for understanding this movement and period is the appreciation of freedom. It was important for all people to have freedom of speech. Important things were education, patriotism, liberalism and radicalism, but also and nationalism. People were expressing their emotions freely and the bullet point was often on their emotions.

So, we can say that in our 21. century the most important thing someone as  Romantic can have is an expression of everything that they think about. This century Romantics in the cycle of life would appreciate the value of education as one of the most meaningful things, also art, music, equality and, imagination.

These people would fight all of the norms of behavior that were imposed by some other people and they wouldn't afraid to show emotions or feelings whatever they were like, bad emotions such as suffering, pain, fear, misunderstanding. They would fight for rights for all people and equality of all. In the cycle of life, Romantics would love nature and everything about it. Back then, romantics were showing always more appreciation for small towns, villages, forests and they would reject all the material things that we have nowadays because the key is knowledge, morals and, culture.

A romantic would not be one who violates today's law but one who wants equality and freedom for all people.

write two paragraphs to compare and contrast the narrators’ schools and explain how their schools shape their perspectives toward the hijab. cite evidence from the text to support your ideas.

copy and paste answer:

two paragraphs to compare and contrast the narrator's schools would be this, the one school with the veil is the one school were the students were forced to wear the veils, and they did not know why they had to wear the veils. the girl student writing the story was not like the other students, she didn't care. in the second school there was a lot of hostile activities going on throughout the school. most of the students were upset and this, including the author, but she was trying to look and the good side of things.  

overall, both schools had something that the students or most of the students did not like or appreciate. what you can learn from these stories is that life will never be exactly how you may want it to be. complaining about your lifestyle will only make matters worse or at least feel worse in the long run. that's happens to be the information you can interpret from these two stories.

in what passage i'm sorry but i don't see anything there.