Which best states alexa's position on soda?
read alexa's argumentative essay
sugary drinks are not good for kids. too much soda has
been proven to weaken bones and cause tooth decay.
sugary drinks also contain many calories with no nutrition.
kids who drink too much soda can gain weight, which
leads to more health problems. i encourage my friends to
drink lots of water and say "no" to soda
soda tastes delicious.
soda is unhealthy for kids.
sugary drinks strengthen teeth.
sugary drinks improve health.

B. Soda is unhealthy for kids.

Explanation:

Literally, the whole passage is of that chick Alexa saying how bad soda is for you.

The correct answer is B. Soda is unhealthy for kids

Explanation:

In an argumentative essay, the position of the author is the main point of idea the author tries to prove, due to this, all the details included in an essay explain or prove this position. In the case of Alexa's essay she includes details such as "Too much soda has been proven to weaken bones" or "I encourage my friends to drink lots of water and say "no" to soda" that show Alexa is against drinking soda due to health as she explains soda leads to issues in bones, teeth, overweight, among others. Thus, the position or main point of Alexa according to these details is "Soda is unhealthy for kids".

it is natural to stand at the beginning of a research project and feel overwhelmed by the amount of published research that exists in databases, literature reviews, and reference pages. at the same time, each new research project brings the hope of discovering something new. overwhelming though a project may be, starting at the foothills of a new thread of research is a great privilege, and is best approached as an opportunity to learn rather than a drudgery. as a researcher/writer, you have the chance to dive more deeply into less frequently encountered pools of knowledge.

depending on the topic or scope of your research, it is also natural to spend many days and weeks - and in some cases months and years - searching. no matter how great or small the scope of research is, the serious researcher needs to reserve adequate time to perform a thorough survey of published articles. for an undergraduate course project, finding five or six sources might seem like plenty of material to review, but graduate-level writing projects typically involve up to 20 sources minimum.

note that the main point here is not to say that it is only the number of research articles matters most, but rather that having a broad spectrum of papers to choose from you choose your topic for at least the following two reasons: 1) a larger pool of sources provides you with a broader perspective of the topics within your scope of research and 2) along the way you will find many topics within your field that you do not want to write about! so, one particularly effective way of viewing research is not finding the absolute minimum sources to "get by", but rather to find a variety of sources that you can an artist uses negative space to "carve" shapes out of a dark guide you toward topics that are more directly relevant to your topic.

the good news is that as you research you may find that some of your sources that were published in the same decade or so will cite and reference each other.

one of the joys and privileges of research is being able to follow your curiosity; if you are truly curious about your topic, and authentically driven to find out as much as you can, then even the articles you don't find interesting will be useful for a future project, and no energy will be wasted.