In the following dialogue, which discussion technique does daniel most clearly show?

daniel: did you guys feel the article was biased? kim sato is a newscaster from japan. since newscasters get money and fame when they deliver a big story, i think that it’s possible that kim just wants to stir up some controversy.

a. asking clarifying questions
b. assess the claims of others
c. challenging established ideas
d. conducting research to support conclusions

Is the slightly humorous tone of kristof's essay inappropriate for a discussion of deliberately killing wild animals? why or why not?

Now long and short works of fiction have different characteristics beyond simply the length of the work. think of a short story that you like and a longer work (novel or novella) that you like. you can use the story and novella from this unit if no other works come to mind quickly. discuss the elements of each work that made it enjoyable to read. what relationship did the form of the work (short story, novella, or novel) have in making it an enjoyable read? what elements of fiction were strongest in the work, and how did they impact your enjoyment of the story? compare the two works you chose. how are they representative of short fiction versus longer forms of fiction?

Which claim does the sentence "teach english and play with children in local orphanages by day and enjoy the sights and new friends by night" support?