Read this excerpt from franklin's autobiography and answer the question that follows. then i walked up the street, gazing about till near the market-house i met a boy with bread. i had made many a meal on bread, and, inquiring where he got it, i went immediately to the baker's he directed me to, in secondstreet, and ask'd for bisket, intending such as we had in boston; but they, it seems, were not made in philadelphia. then i asked for a three-penny loaf, and was told they had none such. so not considering or knowing the difference of money, and the greater cheapness nor the names of his bread, i made him give me three-penny worth of any sort. he gave me, accordingly, three great puffy rolls. i was surpriz'd at the quantity, but took it, and, having no room in my pockets, walk'd off with a roll under each arm, and eating the other. thus i went up market-street as far as fourth-street, passing by the door of mr. read, my future wife's father; when she, standing at the door, saw me, and thought i made, as i certainly did, a most awkward, ridiculous appearance. the tone of this excerpt can best be described as

first of all wood chucks don't "chuck" wood. none, and for the fun of the answer the amount of wood chucked would be a lot!

explanation:

a wood chuck is a ground hog, it belongs to the family of large underground squirrels. it belongs to the family of marmots. ground hogs eat grasses, berry's, and other vegetation.

c hydrophobia is the answer

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.

is there a book if so take some time to read that book and then you   mite find the answer cause i dont know this story