Imagine you have given a task to write a persuasive speech where you challenge a recent new law banning the use of cell phones in cars. which statement, if included in the speech, would be considered a logical fallacy? a) if we eliminate cell phones in cars, no one will be able to communicate with one another. if we keep them, life will continue in harmony. b) banning cell phones completely from vehicles is unreasonable and shortsighted, as people use them for a number of things that actually enhance safety. c) cell phones, though sometimes a distraction if people are allowed to drive with them in their hands, still have a place in cars with proper restrictions. d) none of these choices would represent a logical fallacy, as they all make sound logical sense and would strengthen the argument in an objective, unbiased way.

the answer is love is powerful hop this

what gradee ya in so we can do it im 8th grade

                                                        -hannahsgachagal

                                                          (p.s thats my real you tube lol)

in this passage from chapter 6 of "animal farm", by george orwell, what the author is ridiculing in this passage is the frivolity of some rules.

clover, the mare, believes she remembers that the fourth commandment forbade sleeping in beds because it was something that humans did. snowball, napoleon, and the pigs are brain-workers who look after the welfare of the farm. they are the obvious leaders because they are smart, and so they are entitled to eat the best food and sleep in beds. it is squealer, who says these lines making the difference between sleeping with sheets, what humans do, and sleeping in beds, what pigs do. the unwillingness to question authority makes the oppressed to obey without thinking.