Which of the following is not a disadvantage of offering the sale of shares in
a company?
a. the company must disclose details about its finances.
b. the management loses some control over the operation of the
business.
c. the government has more restrictions over a publicly owned
company
d. the company can increase its capital without going into debt.
neeed nw

the answer would be D

Explanation:

I just took the test

D. The company can increase its capital without going into debt.

Explanation:

When a company offers up the sale of its shares, the following are some of what happens:

The company must provise an up-to-date record of its business tranactions; this is a disadvantage for the company because the more information one has control over, the more in power the company is. Hence, option A is a disadvantage

When there is sale of shares, a company is automatically yieling over a certain portion of its control/power to the buyer and this also is a disadvantage. Hence, option B is wrong

In the case of  publicly owned  company, the government has more restrictions such a company which increases the control the government has over the company. Hence, option C is also a disadvantage

When a company offers up its shares for sale, although the company cedes a certain portion of its company to the buyer, the company stands to receive financial rejuvenation/boost without going into debt or declaring bankruptcy. Hence, option A is an advantage

answer: no

explanation:

one context clue that me find the meaning of luxuriance was that the base word of luxuriance is luxury, so i think that luxuriance means something that is luxury, or something luxurious.