How does the alliteration in line 6 affect the poem's tone?

it creates a sinister tone that emphasizes the eeriness of the moon.

it creates a soft and tranquil tone that emphasizes the moon's quietness.

it creates a harsh tone that emphasizes the brightness of the moon.

it creates an elusive tone that emphasizes how foreign the moon is.

posting this to give y'all the "it creates a soft and tranquil tone that emphasizes the moon's quietness."

Im writing an essay and i need an honest opinion on the prompt i will lgive a and 20 points asap. tell me if you think its ok to test on animals? why or why not? if no then do you think it would be ok to test on humans instead?

Read these lines from denise levertov's poem "in thai binh (peace) province": it is that life, unhurried, sure, persistent, i must bring home when i try to bring the war home. child, river, light. here the future, fabled bird that has migrated way from america, nests, and breeds, and sings, common as any sparrow. which statement best interprets the author's use of metaphor in these lines? a. the metaphor of home suggests that american foreign policy should turn inward. b. the metaphor of the river suggests that life moves ear forward. c. the metaphor of the fabled bird suggests that the war has left americans divided. d. the metaphor of the fabled bird suggests that vietnam will rise to fight again.

Which revision, if any, best fixes the bolded (capitalized in this case) part of the sentence? female cardinals, a somewhat drab bird compared to the males, blend in well with their environment. no change somewhat drab birds a somewhat drab's bird somewhat drab bird's