In her article "why should i vote? " stephanie goggin crafts a well-organized and coherent argument. she states that every person of voting age who is registered should vote. she also argues that if you are not registered to vote, you should be. in conclusion, goggin's argument is laid out in a thoughtful and thorough way that is convincing to readers. which element is missing from this evaluation? summary of the claim thesis statement concluding statement evaluation of evidence

recent news about two years ago indicates that a polish forestry student by chance unearthed at a depth of about 40cm (16 inches), during digging in a damp polish forest he found a 13-page manuscript into a thermos flask.

greek jew marcel nadjari was a aischwitz slave who witnessed how the nazi's built big death chambers and crematoriums and told how he was forced to escort fellow jews to the gas chambers. he accounts on this manuscript how the nazi's disguised this chambers to look like showers. also, he describes this place as a process of extermination from the chambers to the trains arriving to take the bodies.

i would say the answer is erm c but if you dont agree im so sorry

the strategies is fictional storied