which statement best evaluates the reasoning in this excerpt from "argument"?

in order to keep that good temper which is so difficult and yet so necessary to preserve, you should consider that nothing can be more unjust or ridiculous than to be angry with another because he is not of your opinion.

the argument is not sound; the author relies on circular reasoning

the reasoning is sound; the author's argument is logical.

the argument is sound; the author relies on facts.

the argument is not sound; the author relies on overgeneralization.

i think it is

Explanation:

The argument is not sound; the author relies on circular reasoning

The statement that best evaluates the reasoning in this excerpt from "Argument" is The reasoning is sound; the author's argument is logical.

Explanation:

Sound reasoning is a kind of argument that makes sense and appeals to logic, the thesis that a person can not be angry at another just because of their beliefs has a totally logic fundament and it can be proved through common sense and social experimentation, it is considered illogic to try to impose over others.

the purpose of the heading in the passage is to identify who is telling the story.

this excerpt is part of the book sugar changed the world (2010) written by marc aronson and marina budhos. as the book has been written by two people, the heading "marc" indicates that this specific excerpt is being narrated by aronson. in the fragment, marc describes his grandfather's story after hearing it from his cousin. however, there are other excerpts where budhos is the one that tells the story of her family.

aronson and budhos, who are husband and wife in real life, decided to write sugar changed the world when they found out how sugar, which had an important role in slavery and economy, changed their ancestors' lives.