Which one of the following is an indictator that a source may not be accurate?

a. the author is using emotionally charged language and innappropriate words or employing a tone that reveals an obvious bias.

b. the author doesn't offer facts, statistics, or specific examples, but uses vague statments and sweeping generalizations.

c. the writing is sub-par or contains errors

d. you're unable to find any other source that presents the same exact information or point of view.

to me these all seem inaccurate sources! !

The author doesn't offer facts, statistics, or specific examples, but uses vague statements and sweeping generalizations is an indicator that a source may not be accurate.

Option B

Explanation:

Obviously, it is very important for the author to also mention from where the details are obtained so that they can be referred or checked in case there is a need to verify the same. While verifying is secondary, inclusion is something which can be interpreted.

Such that the author has done enough research to make a claim through the data being used and point being made.  Through the addition of facts, statistics and specific examples, the author establishes credibility and accuracy in the statements being made.

yes, they are. i think.

lil whire

explanation: