5. unes 73-77: are yoni and serge communicating well with
evidence supports your view
6. lines 83-100: what do sergel's actions tell you about his personality how
sergei's actions contrast with yoni's first impression of sergel what is the erect
7. lines 104-113: what is an example of understatement in these lines. what does
this tell you about sergei's character?
8, lines 124-127: explain what new information is revealed about sergei's character
in these lines.
9. lines 135-150: what do sergel's first two wishes reveal about his character? how
are these wishes like his reaction when yoni looks at hus goldfish? how are the
wishes different from his reaction?
10. lines 135-144: what technique does the author use to tell us about sergei's
wishes? what effect does this have?
11. lines 159-166: what type of relationship do sergei and the goldfish have? what
evidence in the text reveals this? what does this say about sergei
12. línes 176-181: why does yoni think the arab he finds is perfect for his film?

How can the rebuttal best address the counterclaim? read the claim and reason beginning in high school students should eam their own money by finding aher school employment. an aber school job seves not only as income, but as valuable experience for when students leave school for the workiorce. read the counterclaim and reason while having a source of income can certainly be a learning experience for high school students, they should maintain their focus on academics and extracurricular activities working atter school many experts agree, can lead to a decrease in school success which can then limit students' options when they enter the workforce the rebuttal should include examples of jobs that are available to students and the problems associated with those jobs the rebuttal should acknowledge that school remains a priority and discuss the benefits of a balance between school and work the rebuttal should address the need for a discussion on the matter by restating both points before reaching a conclusion the rebuttal should state a logical explanation for both opinions before granting credibility to the need for school to remain a priority