What must you do in the rebuttal of your argument to challenge another writer’s assumptions?

a- explain why they are accurate.
b- explain where they found the information.
c- explain why they don’t hold up.
d- explain how they found the evidence.

i saw some answers with d but c feels more right, if you have the answer, can you give an explanation? cheers!

Read the excerpt from infinite jest 'my application's not bought," i am telling them, calling into the darkness of the red cave that opens out before closed eyes. 'tam not just a boy who plays tennis. i have an intricate history. experiences and feelings. i'm complex. "read,' i say. 'i study and read. i bet i've read everything you've read. don't think i haven't. i consume libraries. i wear out spines and rom-drives. i do things like get in a taxi and say, "the library, and step on it." my instincts concerning syntax and mechanics are better than your own, i can tell, with due respect. the theme suggested by the excerpt is about a. being understood b. the value of education c. wisdom versus foolishness d. learning responsibility