Though the alchemist obviously understands the language of the world and has special tools and powers at his disposal, he does not actually offer to santiago out of a challenging and dangerous situation. on the contrary, he places santiago in the center of an apparently dangerous situation when he tells the chief and his men that santiago is an alchemist who can turn himself into the wind. if he is supposed to be a mentor to santiago, why does he do this?

its d because i know

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.