Construct an argument of at least 250 words for or opposed to curfew laws for teenagers. include a strong thesis and use logical evidence to support your argument.

It is 260 words edit it to fit your requirements.

Explanation:

Teen curfews discriminate against young minorities and violate the rights of minors. I think that teen curfews confine all young teens based on actions of a small percentage of our population. Curfews are often needed to prevent teens from getting into trouble late at night and many people argue if parents should be held responsible for this. I understand many parents set up rules and other restrictions for their teens to follow, but I don't think parents should take the liability on what their child is doing. These rules are usually given in addition to control, protect, and teach their teen in order for them to know what's right from wrong. It should be a parent’s choice on how long their child can be out for, not the state’s. In other states, parents are held responsible for their child's actions. If they let their children out past midnight, they could be fined up to $75 for the first offense. The only way minors could stay out after midnight is if they are accompanied by a parent or guardian over twenty-one years old. Many public places such as the mall have banned children from hanging out after a certain time and I think the problem with this is where will it send the children.? If they can't go to the mall to "hangout" they are going to end up in a abounded place or basement somewhere drinking because there is nothing else to do. This causes children to be more secretive and will end up shoving them into the wrong crowd.

ha ahahahahah ahaha hah ha hahah ah ahahahahahaha ha ha haha a haha im a tro

government played the key role in promoting industrialization in russia while individual businesses played a larger role in great britain. or for apex a