5.

why does the author likely include the section entitled "changing russia"?

a. to prove that nicholas ii was actually a good leader but that his rule was marred

by tragedies out of his control

b. to acknowledge that progress was being made in russia under nicholas il but

that the rate of change was too slow

c. to point out that the progress made under nicholas ll contributed to the

revolution, for more people were being educated and began demanding change

to note that the changing structure of the cities (i. e. increased population) made

it easier for riots to break out and eventually violent revolution

d.

Answer:

The author likely include the section entitled "Changing Russia" C: To point out that the progress made under Nicholas ll contributed to the revolution, for more people were being educated and began demanding change

Explanation:

“Nicholas II” was the last emperor of Russia and was forcefully abdicated in 1917. He is believed to be a weak and incompetent ruler. He gave limited support to economic and political reforms. He was criticized for forced suppression of ‘Russian Revolution’ in 1905, for ‘Bloody Sunday’ and was even held responsible for the defeat in ‘Russo-Japanese war’.

Population was increasing at an increasing rate. The number of Russian university students increased from 5000 to 69000. There was increase in number of educational institutions leading to a substantial increase in educated population which then demanded change.

Then in 1917, Nicholas was forced to abdicated. He is believed to be a very biased leader of his times.

a, a knight

so is this a rhetorical question?