Ineed an argumentative essay on why video games are beneficial but not harmful.

the intro needs a hook, the issue, summary sentence (your 2 reasons) and the claim (thesis) in that order.

two body paragraphs for each reason, with three pieces of evidence.

a counterclaim that begins to build up the opposing view, but then takes it down with proof.

a conclusion that is basically the intro but with rearranged words. i can probably edit this.

this is due in the morning, but it is worth 44 points.

nvm I can't think of anything... hope you pass tho          Explanation:

butt

explanation:

given the fact that the question is about the detail that best support the idea that oppressive leaders use   propaganda to achieve thir goals,   the first option does not refer to any kind of propaganda, since it only tells about that the milk and the windfall apple should be reserved for the pigs. in the second option, that is, "snowball and napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on the neighbouring farms, tell them the story of the rebellion, and teach them the tune of "beasts of england". it can be identified that the oppressors make use of the propaganda, which is represented by the pigeons, and the information they have to tell other animals about what was happening in the farm in order to get their objectives. for that reason, the right answer is the second option, taking into account that the third option do not refer to propaganda since it only talks about that they did not want jones back. and, finally, the last option refers to the result of the given news, but it does not mean about the propaganda they used to achieve their goals.