Do you agree with lundstrom that it is inconsistent to deny privilege like voting and drinking to teenagers but then to sentence them as adults? why?

I don’t agree with Lundstrom that it is inconsistent to deny privileges like voting and drinking to teenagers but then to sentence them as adults, setting the early age standards to allow teenagers to vote and drink is to connive them. People would never know what could a teenager do, their behaviors are erratic. But that doesn’t mean they would be free from trails, the title of “juveniles” does not indicate that they are

innocent in every situations, in certain circumstances, they should be tried as adults

Explanation:

c. when the head chef asks the applicants to make any creative dish they like (i did the usatestprep)

both inform the reader that faryad and liaqat were not given the chance to tell their version of events at the police station.

hope this