The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 residents) in meadowbrook is 60 percent higher now than it was four years ago. the corresponding increase for parkdale is only 10 percent. these figures support the conclusion that residents of meadowbrook are more likely to become victims of violent crime than are residents of parkdale.
the argument above is flawed because it fails to take into account
(a) changes in the population density of both parkdale and meadowbrook over the past four years
(b) how the rate of population growth in meadowbrook over the past four years compares to the corresponding rate for parkdale
(c) the ratio of violent to nonviolent crimes committed during the past four years in meadowbrook and parkdale
(d) the violent crime rates in meadowbrook and parkdale four years ago
(e) how meadowbrook’s expenditures for crime prevention over the past four years compare to parkdale’s expenditures

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

go to crash course lititure and go to seconed page and it shows a video about that

agamemnon was the leader of the greek troops in the trojan wars and orestes was his son. when agamemnon returned from the war, he was murdered by his wife's lover in conjunction with his wife. orestes could not stop them but he seeked vengeance for his father. after a long time, he found them and avenged his father while killing them. he killed his mother, but greek mythology claims that his act was just and he was spared the remorse and the guilt. there are a lot of similarities with the ulysses/telemachus father son pair. ulysses was also one of the leaders of the excursion to troy. he still has not returned home, but in a sense the suitors of penelope are marring his estate and his reputation. while penelope is faithful to ulysses, the suitors by taking hold of the palace and committing their shameful acts are dishonoring ulysses. in the same context, telemachus is asked just like orestes to restitution his father's honor, regardless of whether he is alive or dead. athena is him and encouraging him with this example and he himself feels the need to save his father

what are the statements?