"after murdering colonel felisbert, procopio finds out that the colonel designated procopio as the sole heir in his will. guilt-ridden yet not confessing his crime, procopio decides to accept the inheritance and to distribute it in small sums to different charities. procopio says, “this was not merely scruple on my part, it was also the desire to redeem my crime by virtuous deeds; and it seemed the only way to recover my peace of mind and feel that accounts were straight.”

based on the quote above:
do you agree with procopio’s decision? does it justify his crime? why or why not?

Super bowl 2019 how to watch is this link ok> > >

How does mercutio, in romeo and juliet, convey his anger before dying?

In a 10-12 sentence response-style paragraph, explore the degree to which you agree or disagree with faulkner’s message. “i believe that man will not merely endure: he will prevail. he is immortal, not because he alone among creatures has an inexhaustible voice, but because he has a soul, a spirit capable of compassion and sacrifice and endurance. the poet's, the writer's, duty is to write about these things. it is his privilege to man endure by lifting his heart, by reminding him of the courage and honor and hope and pride and compassion and pity and sacrifice which have been the glory of his past. the poet's voice need not merely be the record of man, it can be one of the props, the pillars to him endure and prevail” (faulkner 773-775).