Hurry im being timed

isaacson's opinion is that kota art is "powerful," even if we do not know much about the kota people. which evidence does he use to support this opinion?

o our imagination tells us that we are looking at a human figure.
o its triangles, cylinders, and parts of circles remind us of eyes, a neck, and hair.
o it can reach across a hundred years and a language we don't understand to touch our lives.
o it excites our imagination, and our imagination turns the kota figure into a person.