PART A : Which of the following identifies the central idea of the text ? [ RI.2 ) A. Social phenomena are similar to diseases because of how difficult it is to determine their source B. The progress of social phenomena is uncontrollable, like some diseases, and therefore are pointless to attempt to improve . C. The similarities between social phenomena and diseases show the significance small changes can have on overall social trends. D. Like diseases, in order to wipe out certain social phenomena you must eradicate all potential causes of the phenomenon.

I assume you are referring to Malcolm Gladwell's article "The Tipping Point". If that's so, the correct answer is C. The similarities between social phenomena and diseases show the significance small changes can have on overall social trends.

Explanation:

Gladwell emphasizes the connection between social phenomena and contagious diseases on the grounds that neither of them necessarily happen in a linear way. In other words, the effects don't have to be proportionate to their causes.

When police tries to tackle the rising violent-crime rate, the common-sense approach would be to introduce drastic measures. But sometimes, even those won't help. Instead, it's often more effective to introduce "the most modest of changes" to "bring about enormous effects". Those small changes, when accumulated, can just about reach the "tipping point", the point from which things will start improving dramatically.

A famous example was the so-called "broken window" experiment in Palo Alto. The researchers parked a car on a street. The car was left untouched for over a week. When they parked the same car without a licence plate in a similar neighborhood, it was stripped in less than a day. To prove their point completely, they then decided to smash one of its windows. In just a couple of hours, the car was completely destroyed. This experiment (as well as Gladwell's central thesis) shows that violence always invites more violence. Therefore, a tiny change can bring about great results if applied at the right time and place to help reach the tipping point.

idk but i did find this

explanation:

in the story of the cowardly lion and the hungry tiger, we first see the two characters inside the empty throne room of ozma, bored and sadly very much aware of their uselessness as guardians. they talked about the good old days when they used to be feared. they proceeded to make up stories of how fearsome they were. the cowardly lion professed that he can tear men/women into pieces, while the hungry tiger said he would eat fat babies. but when they proceeded to act upon their words they were forced to realize that they were indeed harmless and good animals who would rather be called cowardly and hungry than harm a woman or eat a child.

hello!

your answer is a. ethical, emotional, and rational.

in order for someone to believe what you say it has to be ethical (morally correct). it should appeal to their emotions, and it must be rationally approving.

also, the other answer is incorrect.

hope this !

mark me brainliest!

have a great day!

~courtney