subject
English, 20.02.2020 07:01 glowbaby123

2 Points
Which statement accurately compares the diction in Andrew Jackson's "On
Indian Removal" to that in Michael Rutledge's "Samuel's Memory"?
O
A. Jackson uses feelings to persuade the audience, whereas
Rutledge uses logical reasoning.
O
B. Jackson's writing is difficult to fully believe, whereas Rutledge's
writing is much more honest.
O
c. Jackson is emotionally detached, whereas Rutledge comes
across as deeply emotional.
O
D. Jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas Rutledge
relies on short, direct sentences.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 15:00
Read this passage from "the american dream." one of the first things we notice in this dream is an amazing universalism. it does not say some men, but it says all men. it does not say all white men, but it says all men, which includes black men. it does not say all gentiles, but it says all men, which includes jews. it does not say all protestants, but it says all men, which includes catholics. how does the use of rhythm contribute to the ideas in the passage? a .it supports key points by connecting them. b. it states rational ideas to support a claim. c. it convinces people that the ideas are true. d. it connects the ideas to people in a specific place.
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 16:30
When should readers refer to a dictionary instead of relying on context clues? select all that apply.when they have timeeach unfamiliar word they findwhen the surrounding words are unfamiliarwhen an unfamiliar word appears frequently
Answers: 3
question
English, 21.06.2019 21:00
What argument does thomas jefferson make in this excerpt from the declaration of independence? we hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.-that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. a. b. c. the american colonists desire a more peaceful alliance with great britain but their british counterparts do not. the american colonists have a right to seek freedom from great britain due to the continued oppression of their basic rights. the american colonies could form a better government than the one established by great britain to govern them. the king of britain and the members of british parliament have little interest in the welfare of the colonies. od. e. the american colonies should have sufficient representation in british parliament if america and great britain are to coexist peacefully.
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:30
1. at the conclusion of chapter 13, the monster realizes that he has none of the qualities or possessions that human beings value, and so he worries the he will be forever miserable. he says, “oh, that i had for ever remained in my native wood, nor known nor felt beyond the sensations of hunger, thirst, and heat! ” this statement recalls one made by victor frankenstein in chapter 10: “if our impulses were confined to hunger, thirst, and desire, we might nearly be free; but now we are moved by every wind that blows, and a chance word or scene that that word may convey to us.” questions: what do these two statements suggest about the impact of knowledge? how do the statements affect the way readers view the monster and victor?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
2 Points
Which statement accurately compares the diction in Andrew Jackson's "On
Indian...
Questions
question
Physics, 03.01.2021 20:30
Questions on the website: 13722361