How might michael macks argument be interpreted as sound advice for collage in general, not just for reading shakespeare? Explain

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.

i am not sure, but i think the correct answer is a.

hope it : -)

i need the question options are if theres some?