Shaun sighed, looking at the dark, empty driveway, for he knew his dad would not be home on time. His dad had promised he would come early so that they could go swimming, but it was already dusk and there was no word from him. The next day, he confided in his friend Peter about how hurt he felt because his dad had been breaking his promises lately, and Peter suggested he should talk to his dad about it. The following day, Shaun had a long talk with his dad, and he realized that his dad had been busier than usual because his colleague had met with an accident and was bed-ridden for the past two months. He hugged his dad with more understanding about his job.

Which is the best summary of the paragraph?
A.
Shaun tells his friend Peter that his dad has been breaking his promises lately, which makes him feel sad and disturbed. Peter advises him to talk to his dad about it and find out the reason his dad has been breaking his promises.
B.
Shaun feels hurt that his dad has not been keeping his promises lately. After talking to his dad, he realizes that his dad has been working late, because his colleague had met with an accident. Shaun feels better now that he has better understanding about his dad’s job.
C.
Shaun has a discussion with his dad about how disheartened he feels when his dad breaks his promises. Shaun's dad sees his sadness and feels guilty about breaking his promises. He assures him that it will not happen again.
D.
Shaun feels upset as it is late in the evening and his dad has not yet come home from the office. Earlier, his dad had promised him they would go swimming, which will not be poss

answer:

a.

Explanation:

its basically the story yet in a short version of what actually happened so .. yeah i think no im pretty sure its A

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this