How does the evidence support the claim that "political
speech and writing are largely the defense of the
indefensible"?
It presents statistics that prove that language is
often used to defend the indefensible.
It gives an example of how language helps people
reveal the truth.
O It provides a hypothetical example of how someone
can use language to hide terrible acts.
O It uses a quotation from an expert to show how
language can be used to defend immoral acts.

George Orwell uses examples - 'millions of peasants are robbed of their farms', 'people are imprisoned for years without ot trial or shot in the back of the neck.

These are all examples he uses to support his claim of 'political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensibe' but using examples of the indefensible.

HOPE THAT HELPS

Explanation:

George Orwell uses examples - 'millions of peasants are robbed of their farms', 'people are imprisoned for years without ot trial or shot in the back of the neck.

These are all examples he uses to support his claim of 'political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensibe' but using examples of the indefensible.

Explanation:

i think there should be answer choices