Hunter’s velocity was 4.5 m/s. At the end of his race, his velocity was the same. Which best describes his movement?
A. His movement stopped.
B. His acceleration is zero.
C. His time was constant.
D. His acceleration was positive.

his acceleration was zero

Explanation:

when the last speed and the first speed are same,the acceleration becomes zeroaccelaration=first speed-last speed\time...here a=4.5-4.5\time=0\time=0

We can describe Hunter's movement by the statement B. his acceleration is zero.

Acceleration is defined as the rate of change of velocity. Hunter's velocity is constant, which means that it did not change over the considered period of time. When the change in velocity is zero, the acceleration is also zero. If his acceleration was positive, his final velocity would be greater than 4.5 m/s, and if it were negative, then his final velocity would be less than 4.5 m/s.

Explanation:

hi there

the contrast between a clear and understood meaning is that the clear meaning of a poem is that the detail is exactly defined. nothing is left to (understanding/ explanation). an understood meaning is a suggested meaning. kabir's poetry is both clear and understood in that it can be understood/explained on different levels. the clear meaning leaves nothing to (understanding/ explanation) while the understood meaning leaves lots open to (understanding/ explanation). an example of this is found in the poem "rumi and the (related to religion or the soul) lover".

hoped i