What connection does the author draw between low socioeconomic status and access to postsecondary education?

***Using the article "Making college more affordable: The importance of pre-collegiate Preparation" by Reynold Verret***

Verret clarifies that albeit most positions require postsecondary schooling, the exorbitant cost of advanced education diminishes the conceivable outcomes of access for understudies of low financial status.

Verret claims that understudies beginning professions that needn't bother with advanced educations ought to approach postsecondary declarations and certifications.  

Making school more reasonable,  executes the California Comeback Plan's development of the Cal Grant program for junior college understudies by wiping out age and break of-secondary school necessities, with grants that follow understudies to the UC and CSU upon move  

Obligation Forgiveness Affirms College's Value to Low-Income Students. Lessening educational cost costs vows to further develop school access and graduation rates.

Be that as it may, numerous understudies and graduates have effectively taken out enormous advances to get their certifications. For one's purposes, research demonstrates that dropping understudy obligation would support the economy.

For more information, refer the following link:

link

Explanation:

Verret explains that although most jobs require postsecondary education, the high price of higher education reduces the possibilities of access for students of low socioeconomic status. Verret claims that students starting careers that do not need college degrees should have access to postsecondary certificates and credentials.

idk vro dont ask me lol