Which of the following is good preparation for a peer review?
A.
Prepare multiple versions of the essay so that the peer reviewer can pick the best one.
B.
Let the peer reviewer know which specific issues to look for in your essay.
C.
Don’t do anything, and let the peer reviewer decide what needs checking in the essay.
D.
Present the peer reviewer with the outline and ask him or her to help you write a rough draft.

c

Explanation:

c because if ya let the person read your essay the can give judgement on what ya wrote.

C

Explanation:

If the person reading your paper knows anything about it, it may affect their judgment on it. Also this is something my teachers have always told me !

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.