English, 23.03.2020 19:57 raytaygirl

Do you think scientists have the right to genetically modify other organisms? Why or why
not?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: yeseniabustillos24

No.

Explanation:

Because we've already messed up nature enough. We were totally fine before we learned about it. Humans aren't extinct. Yet. But, genetically modifying other organisms (including ourselves) I think, is wrong. God or nature (whomever, it doesn't matter) didn't create these creatures for us to experiment on. We were supposed to live in harmony with these animals. So, messing everything up doesn't exactly help.

Have a great day!

lol

Answer from: Quest

many were disgusted, nauseated and shook their heads with disapproval upon finding out about the recycling of water process. however, they do not seem to understand that this process actually saves water.

although individuals may argue that it is unhealthy, and or unsafe to drink water that is "from toilet to tap" , the water is 100% safe to drink and involves forcing the water across a membrane, which "removes any impurities, including viruses, pharmaceuticals and dissolved minerals" , according to paul rozin, a psychology professor who studies revulsion.

i agree that that the thought of drinking water that once ran through someones kitchen sink isn't quite appealing, but recycled wastewater is safe to drink. it also saves water. "the city produces nine million gallons a day" claims russell schreiber, the city’s director of public works.

recycled waste water has absolutely no health concerns whatsoever. when wastewater goes into a system, it's absorbed back into the ground. thus, it goes into a sewer system, then goes through a treatment process that removes contaminants before being released. nonetheless, there is no problem in drinking water that has been recycled.

"in drought-ed california, there are six state agencies that use wastewater that comes from an intellectual property source," according to the university of california, riverside. studies show that this water is completely safe to drink, however, it still doesn't mean people are going to happily pour it in a water glass.

researchers hope it "may make consumers more amenable to drinking recycled wastewater," extraordinarily, women who have a higher "disgust reaction" and make most consumer purchasing decisions.

Answer from: Quest

answer: 1 goes to 3

2 goes to 4

3 goes to 2

4 goes to 1

explanation:

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 16:00

Asap! : ( 20 points! cite textual evidence to support this analysis of the connection. a; he says that he chooses "to believe that there are insufficient finds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation," so it shows that he has given up hope. b; he states, "so we've come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches" of the nation for everyone. this proves that he wants government money to be equally shared. c; mlk explains that america should give african americans "a bad check, a check that has come back marked 'insufficient funds.'" d; he mentions that america wrote a bad check from freedom to african americans, but he states that he "refuses to belive that the bank of justice is bankrupt." he also states, "we've come to cash this or freedom and security of justice."

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 23:40

Select all that apply. identify the objective case personal pronouns. i me you him, her he, she it we us them they

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 03:00

Hey guys..what is the meanings of these word : 1 mazdoori2 rozznamccheplz answer fast

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 07:00

Use context, including antonyms, to determine the meaning of the word hysterical as it is used in fahrenheit 451. write your definition of hysterical here.