Which excerpt from The Land, Part 4 is an example of direct characterization of Paul’s father?

My daddy always liked to have his horses near. Beyond the pasturelands where the horses and cattle grazed were the forests.
I remember my daddy got real quiet. If I just hadn't added that last bit, maybe he would have taken the time to talk more to me.
My daddy decided to take Robert simply because Robert was his son. Everybody knew he would be of no real help with the horses...
I'll never forget the look on my daddy right then. There was temper in him and he could have given me a good walloping right there...

gibberellin = 2

coconut milk = 1

auxin = 3

hope this !

he chooses to climb mount everest and decided not to any more due to the 1,000s of people making a line on the mountion

explanation:

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

wood chucks can't chuck wood so no wood