Evidence in an argument consists of
A.) formatting to support the counterclaim
B.) reason the claim is true
C.) fallacies of the reasoning
D.) formal data explaining the experiment

D

Explanation:

Although the previous three answers are plausible, formal data is the best supporting evident for an argument.

new york state wildlife expert richard thomas found that a woodchuck could   chuck around 35 feet of dirt in the course of digging a burrow. thomas reasoned that if a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would chuck an amount equivalent to the weight of the dirt, or 700 pounds.

it might be feelings and action sorry if i am wrong