In a group discussion, which of these is the best example of synthesizing
claims into a single conclusion?

A. Even though we have different reasons, we all basically agree that
Christopher Marlowe couldn't have written Shakespeare's plays.
B. People have interpreted J. D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye in
many different ways, some optimistically and some
pessimistically
C. When you argue that Shakespeare was anti-imperialist, you don't
really use any kind of evidence that would hold up under close
scrutiny
D. The theater scene from Dickens's Great Expectations proves to me
that the author both enjoyed the theater and had a lighthearted
attitude about it