Now that you've had a little practice analyzing the structure of argumentative texts, let's return to "In Praise of Slacking." What structural elements are missing from the text? Write one possible counterargument opposing the author's claim that doing less is an ideal we should embrace. Then, explain why you do or do not find your counterargument compelling

Refer below.

Explanation:

The creator does exclude an area investigating counterarguments or an end.

In spite of the fact that there are numerous outstanding instances of fruitful journalists who were known—in any event to a limited extent—for their lethargy, instances of individuals who were effective as an immediate consequence of their tirelessness possess large amounts of a wide scope of controls. Michael Jordan, for instance, is broadly viewed as one of the best ball players ever. During his profession, he was known for his tenacious seriousness and scrupulousness. Among writers, Ray Bradbury was known for keeping in touch with one short story consistently—a shocking pace of creation. What's more, numerous other fruitful creators have set page amounts and severe timetables for themselves. Along these lines, while downgrading profitability may have worked for a few, concentrating eagerly on it has worked for some others.

I discover my counterargument genuinely compelling. The creator's contention fundamentally comprises of narrative proof. It would be compelling if the entirety of the accessible proof bolstered the focal case. However, the measure of narrative proof that doesn't bolster the case debilitates the creator's contention and reinforces my counterarguement.

life will not be easy it will be filled with war, lack of resources, damaged planet, and lack of land to live on.

i imagine life will be easier in the sense that we will have better technology and better health and medical advances as well as infustructure growth and economic resilliance we will have much stronger militaries and probably be constintly fighting with other countries for resources and lang that is actually cleanenough to live or farm on . as well i think the need for fresh water will only brainliest answer lol

about the letter or who wrote the letter