Which piece of textual evidence best supports the
inference that the British had better code breakers than the
Russians did?
The Russian admiralty decided that their British allies
could make better use of the codebook than they could,
so it was sent to London.
The codebook was a bonanza for the British code
breakers
© Not only did it contain the columns of code "words" -
groups of randomly selected numbers—on which the
messages were based
[B]ut it also included a changeable key to the cipher
systems used to obscure the coded messages.

Hi! your answer would be  the women's association.  here's why:   "the childrens toys" should be "the children's toys".  there's no apostrophe anywhere, and should go after "children". it does  not go after the 's' because children is already plural, and you usually only add an apostrophe after a plural noun ends with an s, like boys or girls, for example. that is the boys' toys."the women's association", is correct.  it's kinda like the one above.  "the childrens' toys", is not correct. reason why is explained in the first one.  "none of these" isn't correct, because "the women's association" is correct.  hoped i and if you have any more questions, ask me.  -dawn

What was call of the wind about? i’ll but i need a background?